Saturday, January 04, 2003
Yeah, right. little green footballs (lgf) had a contest to determine the following:It is my great honor to announce the winner of the First Annual Robert Fisk Award for Idiotarian of the Year (Fiskie for short). And the winner is ... There is a cartoon in that post.
Very nice, fellows. So, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, former president, and acknowledged do-gooder is an Idiotarian. And Instapundit is willing to link to it (without any commentary). Charming.
Speaking of do-gooders, we Googled around and found this abstract for the final chapter in the Cato Institute's Regulation magazine (summer 2002). Here it is: (our emphasis)The War of the We Against the Me By P. J. O'Rourke
... Upbeat is for sissy do-gooder organizations like Brookings, the U.N., and the Democratic Party. Cato is not a do-gooder organization. We're libertarians. We're not here to do good. We're here to do anything we damn well please -- and take the consequences -- because we are real advocates of freedom. Spoken like a criminal. Let's see what we can get away with. Maybe we can evade "the consequences."
Remember that the next time Bush speaks fondly of "freedom." (especially economic and regulatory freedom) Freedom to steal under a lax system. Freedom to evade, delay, or reverse enactment of consensus views on the environment, product safety, and fiscal honesty. |
posted by Quiddity at 1/04/2003 02:35:00 PM
0 comments
Plotting politics: The Economist has an interesting article about attitudes and values throughout the world and includes several thought-provoking graphs. (We like graphs.) Turns out that Americans are more favorably disposed towards the Russians than Europeans are. |
posted by Quiddity at 1/04/2003 01:47:00 PM
0 comments
Is your name sewed in your underwear as well? George Bush loves to play dress-up. He's been spotted in a number of military outfits, and also puts on this jacket when he's hanging out at his Crawford ranch. Note that it identifies the wearer as "George W. Bush President" of the "United States of America". |
Remind you of anything? How about this from the Larry Sanders show:
posted by Quiddity at 1/04/2003 10:19:00 AM
0 comments
Let's get it out in the open. David Limbaugh of TownHall.com is firmly against cloning, and presents the logic behind his stance. Some excerpts:While we may have made scientific advancements of godlike proportions, there is one of God's prerogatives we'll never have the remotest license to, and that is His authority over our souls.
[...]
[The Clonaid group] are neglecting that little detail we refer to as the soul. Cloning advocates such as Clonaid can't possibly believe in the biblical concept that God creates unique human souls in His own image. Even assuming they can precisely duplicate a human being physically, what about his spiritual aspect? Will he/it have a soul?
[...]
When the God of the Bible tells us through the prophet Jeremiah, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart," I think He's referring to our souls, our essences, not our yet to be fully formed brains. It is a chilling thought that His Jeremiah statement may not apply to beings that He did not form in the womb but that human scientists did. |
posted by Quiddity at 1/04/2003 01:40:00 AM
0 comments
Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who's the weirdest one of all? Ann Coulter begins her most recent essay with this sentence:Most journalists are so stupid, the fact that they are also catty, lazy, vengeful and humorless is often overlooked. We think those words speak for themselves. |
posted by Quiddity at 1/04/2003 01:31:00 AM
0 comments
Friday, January 03, 2003
Helen Thomas don't like Bush: Veteran journalist Helen Thomas pens a sharp essay about Bush's disdain for trial lawyers. The administration wants to put a $250,000 cap on "pain and suffering." We wonder if any proposed legislation will have a COLA formula built in. If not (our suspicion), then it's going to be a farce a few years down the road (if it ever becomes law).
But back to Helen. She ends her piece with these words:There are two ways of enforcing consumer protections. One is through government intervention. That's the job of agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Labor Department, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Federal Aviation Administration and a host of others and their state and local counterparts.
The second way to enforce consumer rights is the private lawsuit. Bush's war on the trial lawyers can only please those from the consumer-be-damned school of corporate wrongdoing. In President Bush's "compassionate conservatism," just whom does he feel compassion for? Thomas is focusing on the "second way", but we hasten to add that Bush doesn't like the "first way" (regulation). One would hope that most problems are stopped with regulation and that litigation is for those cases that slip through the net. But with Bush's emphasis on voluntary-action-instead-of-regulation, the slack has to be taken up by trial lawyers. With caps on awards, that approach is significantly weakened.
Thomas is correct when she says Bush is a supporter of "the consumer-be-damned school of corporate wrongdoing." That explains the absurd Harvey Pitt and his do-nothing SEC. |
posted by Quiddity at 1/03/2003 01:31:00 PM
1 comments
Let's play North Korean Brinksmanship! See how fast you can get to a nuclear conflict. If you land on the special " Bush squares" you can arrive even faster! Start Here Roll 1 dice per move. è | | | Cut off talks with North Korea. Move an additional 3 squares. è | Ê Have you stocked up on Potassium Iodide anti-radiation pills? Ã | | | | | É New York Times is (predictably) concerned about the direction of U.S. foreign policy. Ä | Snub South Koreas President Kim Dae-Jung over his détente strategy. ç Move an additional 4 squares. | | Scrap ABM treaty. ç Move an additional 3 squares. | | | | | U.S. acts as if it isn't restrained by world opinion (ditch various multinational agreements). Move an additional 2 squares. è | Declare North Korea part of the axis of evil. Move an additional 6 squares. è | | Ê Wait for Tony Blair to comment on this issue. (lose 1 turn) Ã | | | | | É Ä | In the Nuclear Posture Review, put North Korea on a list of potential targets for U.S. nuclear weapons. ç Move an additional 5 squares. | | Make disparaging comments about Clinton's handling of North Korea in 1994. ç Move an additional 1 square. | | | | | Talk about lowering the threshold for nuclear weapons by making low-yield tactical nukes available for some battlefield situations. Move an additional 4 squares. è | Bush denounces Kim Jong Il as a "pygmy". Move an additional 2 squares. è | China and Russia appeal for deplomacy to work. ç Move back 3 squares. | Ê Ã | | | | | É Conservative webloggers get very excited. Ä | Sen. Richard Lugar presses for cooler heads to prevail. Move back 3 squares. è | Bush compares Kim Jong Il to "a spoiled child at a dinner table." ç Move an additional 2 squares. | U.S. shows how tough it can be, using Iraq as the example. ç Move an additional 3 squares. | | | | | Confront Pyongyang with evidence of uranium enrichment program. Move an additional 3 squares. è | Announce new U.S. policy of preemptive action. Move an additional 2 squares. è | Do a little destabilizing missile defense testing. Move an additional 3 squares. è | Ê Watch Colin Powell go on all the Sunday talk shows and try to talk down the crisis. Ã | | | | | É Ä | Bush Assails N. Korean Leader, accuses Kim Jong Il of being "somebody who starves his own people." ç Move an additional 2 squares. | | Defense Secretary warns N. Korea that U.S. can wage two wars at once. ç Move an additional 1 square. | | | | | Reject call for non-aggression pact with N Korea. Move an additional 1 square. è | | Make last-minute emergency call to Jimmy Carter? | | Most (unlinked) entries are from this weblog posting.
posted by Quiddity at 1/03/2003 12:52:00 AM
0 comments
Wednesday, January 01, 2003
Frist to the rescue! From the Washington Post:Sen. Bill Frist Aids Accident Victims
2003 - Incoming Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist stopped minutes after a rollover accident on a Florida highway Wednesday, helping tend to the four survivors until paramedics arrived.
1998 - When a gunman opened fire in the U.S. Capitol, Frist, R-Tenn., rushed to aid the victims. He treated one man who had been shot in the face and performed CPR on another man with a chest wound.
1995 - Frist revived a 60-year-old man who collapsed inside a Senate office building.
|
posted by Quiddity at 1/01/2003 09:56:00 PM
0 comments
Tuesday, December 31, 2002
We are going to war: Why? Consider the following stories:This is all costing a lot of money, and for that reason alone, we don't see Bush pulling back after having "invested" so much. |
posted by Quiddity at 12/31/2002 11:44:00 PM
0 comments
Factoid: This has nothing to do with anything, but in a story about the health and fitness of Americans, we encountered this: Roughly half of adult Americans do not drink at all.
posted by Quiddity at 12/31/2002 11:12:00 PM
0 comments
Most oppose tax cuts: Huh?
We happened to notice this AP story today.Nearly two-thirds of respondents in an Associated Press poll said they believe it's prudent to hold off on more tax cuts. ... When asked about new tax cuts, a centerpiece of President Bush's domestic agenda, 64 percent said it was better to hold off to make sure the federal budget does not go into a deeper into the red. About three in 10, 28 percent, said they favored additional tax cuts to stimulate the economy, according to the poll conducted for the AP by ICR/International Communications Research of Media, Pa. |
posted by Quiddity at 12/31/2002 12:29:00 PM
0 comments
George Bush isn't going to like this: In the Washington Post, we find a story that makes us wonder what the president is doing these days. Aides tell us that he's "engaged" with the issues, but with Bush pretty much out-of-sight, you how can we be sure? The president isn't the type of guy who likes to get into the messy details; he prefers to delegate tasks. But that may change soon. According to Warren Christopher, in his New York Times Op-Ed,"I am convinced that this [North Korean] crisis requires sustained attention from top government officials, including the president. It's important to remember that devising a solution for the North Korean crisis will require sustained diplomatic efforts with China, South Korea and other countries of the region. All this will take time, energy and attention." So much for the detached-CEO approach to governing. |
posted by Quiddity at 12/31/2002 09:04:00 AM
0 comments
Monday, December 30, 2002
A little history lesson, please: Blogger Atrios (of Eschaton) has been looking into the Confederate heritage movement, partly as an extension of the flag debate. One outfit, known as the Sons of Confederate Veterans, has been in the news. We found this story from Eschaton's comments section.Man brings Confederate history home
...
Hall is commander of Camp J. Patton Anderson, which is the Olympia chapter of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, an organization open to male descendants of Confederate veterans. Camp Anderson has grown from six to 30 members under Hall's tenure.
...
[Hall said] "Most people think that the whole Civil War was about slavery, but that's just not accurate." How about we check with an authority on the situation? Perhaps Abraham Lincoln's thoughts as expressed in his Second Inaugural. In it, we find:... On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. ...
One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war ... Remember that the next time you hear that the Civil War was fought for high-minded ideals like states rights. |
posted by Quiddity at 12/30/2002 04:11:00 PM
0 comments
Talk is not cheap in Sullivan's eyes: Andrew Sullivan gets all excited about Bush in his year-end round-up. Is it because of Bush's policy decisions? Hardly. Sullivan writes:This was George W. Bush's year. Slowly building toward ridding the world of Saddam's threat, shrewdly identifying North Korea, Iran and Iraq as an axis of evil, demanding democracy from the Palestinians, presiding over modest economic growth despite a terrible global outlook, winning an almost unprecedented vote of approval in the November elections, capping it all with a Philadelphia speech that was a watershed in the GOP's struggle with its own internal demons - by any measure, this was a spectacular performance. The high-point? The U.N. speech. Notice how many of the items are speeches or speech-related (like the election barnstorming). That's all our boy does reasonably well - read speeches. Forget real policy issues, like SEC enforcement, acquiescing to the hawks, environmental decisions, the budget outlook, or judicial nominations. Sullivan would have you evaluate Bush by what Michael Gerson or David "axis of evil" Frum puts under his nose to read. |
posted by Quiddity at 12/30/2002 06:46:00 AM
0 comments
|