Rupert Murdoch's New York Post on Romney in England:Editorial: (emp add)
If Mitt Romney’s trip abroad is meant to burnish his foreign-policy bona fides, he’s off to a reasonably good start — even if the usual boo-birds are painting his remarks in London yesterday as a gaffe. ...
Of much more significance is what Romney said later: “I’m looking forward to the bust of Winston Churchill being in the Oval Office again.”
That would be the bust meant to celebrate — and cement — the special relationship that has informed US-British relations for a century or more.
The bust that was a gift to the American people from Britain in the wake of 9/11 — meant to recall America’s succor as night was falling across Europe in 1940.
If a foreigner came to the United States and bitched about all sorts of things, would a subsequent statement about wanting to have a portrait of George Washington on the wall quell the outrage? Or would it look like a phony gesture of sympathy?
posted by Quiddity at 7/27/2012 11:43:00 AM
The bust of Churchill might be R-MONEY'$ reminder that Churchill was a prodigious drinker and cigar smoker, apparently two no-nos for Mitt.
"I mean, what could Mitt Romney possibly know about running an Olympics?"
R-MONEY'$ in the running to win the GOLD for FLIP-FLOPPING and DRESSAGE-IN-MOUTH.
"I mean, what could Mitt Romney possibly know about running an Olympics?"
Possibly about as much as he did about running a state. One term was about all he could muster. He hung around long enough to build up cred for a presidential run. Didn't matter anyway, because his constituents hated his guts.
