Wednesday, December 21, 2011

CBS Evening News fail:

Here's a story that ran on Tuesday, December 20: (emp add)
LOS ANGELES - Bonnie Ornitz has been out of work for six months.

"All those senses of accomplishment I had from doing my job - they just seem like ancient history now," she told CBS News correspondent Ben Tracy.

Ornitz was laid off by IBM in June, after 30 years in the information technology field.

Ornitz says being out of work is "exponentially more difficult," than she thought it'd be. "Not working is not an option. I come from a family where people worked until they were retired or dead."

Ornitz has applied for 30 jobs near Los Angeles and has had just two interviews. She's collected 24 unemployment checks - $450 each week. She calls the unemployment checks "a godsend."

"It is a lifeline for me and to take that away is going to be devastating," says Ornitz.

Obama to House Republicans: "This is not a game"

If Congress does not extend the unemployment benefits program, Ornitz's checks will stop coming Jan. 7.

House rejects payroll tax cut compromise

Ornitz is frustrated by what she sees in Washington.

"They don't face the things we face. They all want my vote -- but I don't exist to them. They don't want to see it. We're not important to them."

She added: "I don't think they care one bit - on either party."

According to the National Employment Law Project, 1.8 million Americans will lose their federal unemployment benefits in January. As many as six million will lose them during 2012. California would be hardest hit - 714,000 people would be cut off.

"I'm not someone who is looking to take advantage of the system," says Ornitz. "I want to get on with my life and I want to work."

She's now planning to use her life's savings to pay her bills. She may have to sell her house if she can't find work.
Viewers come off with the impression that both parties are uninterested in extending unemployment. The facts are otherwise.

Republicans were never much interested in extending unemployment. This was evident in the negotiations of December 2010 when a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts was traded for continued 99-week unemployment insurance.

But more important is this: The current (Republican) House-passed bill that extends the Social Security cut has a provision that reduces the unemployment from 99 to 79 weeks - and possibly 59 weeks (depending on circumstances).

CBS News will not tell viewers that important aspect of the legislation in their story about the impact of unemployment insurance. CBS News will not let viewers know the House Republican position on this issue.


Traditionally people who could not find a job after their unemployment insurance expired were referred to the welfare office.

At what point should people like Ornitz transition from unemployment benefits to welfare benefits? Or should unemployment insurance simply be permanent and perpetual?

By Anonymous jms, at 12/21/2011 5:17 PM  

Post a Comment