Thursday, July 29, 2010

Lanny Davis defends Charlie Rangel:

Are those fellows peas in a pod or what? In any event, here's one of Davis' bullet points: (emp add)
Second, did Rangel significantly enrich himself as a result of his ethical mistakes, if he is found to have made them?
Davis also compares Rangel to Shirley Sherrod, which is certainly imaginative.


Does this skunk really stink? What does stink really mean? Isn't that judgemental? Wouldn't it be more sensitive to refer to Charlie Rangel's ethics as differently-scented?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/29/2010 6:14 PM  

Post a Comment