uggabugga

HOME RSS | .

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Lanny Davis defends Charlie Rangel:

Are those fellows peas in a pod or what? In any event, here's one of Davis' bullet points: (emp add)

Second, did Rangel significantly enrich himself as a result of his ethical mistakes, if he is found to have made them?

Davis also compares Rangel to Shirley Sherrod, which is certainly imaginative.

posted by Quiddity at 7/29/2010 09:12:00 AM

1 comments

Does this skunk really stink? What does stink really mean? Isn't that judgemental? Wouldn't it be more sensitive to refer to Charlie Rangel's ethics as differently-scented?

By Anonymous, at 7/29/2010 6:14 PM