uggabugga





Thursday, April 21, 2005

David Brooks' fact free zone:

About Brooks' most recent NYTimes Op-Ed, Roe's Birth, and Death

David Brooks writes The facts are
When Blackmun wrote the Roe decision, it took the abortion issue out of the legislatures and put it into the courts. REF The Court ruled that the state cannot restrict a woman's right to an abortion during the first trimester, the state can regulate the abortion procedure during the second trimester "in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health," and in the third trimester, demarcating the viability of the fetus, a state can choose to restrict or even to proscribe abortion as it sees fit.
... Blackmun and his concurring colleagues invented a right to abortion, and imposed a solution more extreme than the policies of just about any other comparable nation. REF
Legend
  • Yes - Legal, No - Illegal, Varies - Varies by regions
  • * - Legal during 1st trimester only (exact date may vary)
Country To Protect Mother's Life Physical Health Mental Health Rape Fetal Defects Socio-economic factors On Demand
Austria Yes Yes Yes * Yes * *
Belgium Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Canada Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Denmark Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Finland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
France Yes Yes Yes * Yes * *
Germany Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Greece Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Hungary Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Iceland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Italy Yes Yes Yes * Yes * *
Latvia Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Netherlands Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Norway Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sweden Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
United States Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Varies
Over the past four years Democrats have resorted to the filibuster again and again to prevent votes on judicial nominees they oppose. Up until now, minorities have generally not used the filibuster to defeat nominees that have majority support. REF1 (Richard Paez) REF2 (Marsha Berzon) Over the past five years Republicans and Democrats have resorted to the filibuster again and again to prevent votes on judicial nominees they oppose.


UPDATE: Michael Bérubé looks at how Brooks would have written his essay - using the same logic - about other legal issues forty or fifty years ago.


1 comments

Thank you - I've longed to see junk writing in the Times taken point by point in tabular fashion.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4/21/2005 11:31 AM  

Post a Comment