uggabugga





Sunday, July 18, 2004

Outfoxed - the movie:

While we didn't manage to attend any of the moveon.org events this Sunday, we did have a copy of the film and watched it at about the same time everybody else did.  Overall, we think it was pretty good.  The high point of the film was at the 50 minute mark.  Up until then one is treated to all sorts of examples of Fox Techniques - but as with anything, selective editing can make any enterprise look bad, so you have to trust that the filmmaker has integrity.  Does Fox mislead their audience?  Yes.  That's driven home when the results of a poll are shown.  In a way, it doesn't matter about the details of the Techniques, if they are deliberate, or what the agenda is at Fox.  The fact is that Fox viewers believe in things that aren't true.  Important things like WMDs, world opinion, Iraq - al Qaeda links.

A minor nit: We think there was a bit too much of O'Reilly at the expense of Fox's "news", but that's a matter of taste.  (Also, our videotape did not appear to have closed-captioning.) For those interested, we've broken down the film into broad categories and listed the information in a table and a graphic.



time topic elapsed
00:00:00 Misc intro 00:01:20
00:01:20 Murdoch owns vast media enterprise 00:02:00
00:03:20 Start operation in U.S. (1980's) 00:02:10
00:05:30 Fox News Network starts in 1996 00:05:45
00:06:40 Employees monitored, fearful 00:04:35
00:11:15 Techniques: cut off guest 00:01:05
00:12:20 O'Reilly "shut up" 00:01:00
00:13:20 Techniques: Polling, Graphics, Music
American flag prominent
00:02:10
00:15:30 Techniques: News/Commentary, Ad Libs
Blur distinction btw news & comment
00:02:30
00:18:00 Techniques: "some people say"
A way to slip in opinion
00:01:30
00:19:30 Techniques: Experts
Conservatives: big names, professional
Liberals: obscure, weak
00:02:20
00:21:50 Techniques: Character assassination
Richard Clarke
00:03:05
00:24:55 Techniques: Fox Liberals
Colmes, Estrich, don't challenge forcefully
00:02:00
00:26:55 Techniques: Guests FAIR analysis of Special Report w/Hume 5 times as many Republicans compared to Democrats 00:01:25
00:28:20 Techniques: Stories covered
Jesse Jackson, immigration, 2000 election, Reagan's birthday, abortion, gays, church J. Wolcott: gay marriage not getting traction so FNC focused on religion
00:06:40
00:35:00 O'Reilly "shut up"
P. Hart (media anal for FAIR): "Perfect example of everything wrong with FNC"
Jeremy Glick interview
00:07:30
00:42:30 Fear / Build up to war anti-war = "enemies of state", "traitors" 00:04:15
00:46:45 If you aren't expecting propaganda, then it's more effective 00:00:15
00:47:00 Happy Iran 00:02:10
00:49:10 Poll results
Fox viewers were 4x more likely to be wrong on 3 basic issues:
WMD found: 33% (Fox), 11% (PBS/NPR)
Global support of war: 35% (Fox), 5% (PBS/NPR)
Iraq – al Qaeda links: 67% (Fox), 16% (PBS/NPR)
00:01:35
00:50:45 Partisan : adjunct of Republican party 00:01:00
00:51:45 Carl Cameron interviews Bush in 2000, his wife was campaigning for Bush 00:01:35
00:53:20 Fox called 2000 election, John Ellis (Bush cousin), networks followed, Ailes apologises 00:02:40
00:56:00 Hostile to Clinton, favorable to Bush 00:01:00
00:57:00 2004: Kerry's medals 00:01:40
00:58:40 2004: Bush stump speeches 00:01:20
01:00:00 2004: Kerry's flip-flops. French 00:03:30
01:03:30 2004: econ. good, Kerry bad for econ. 00:03:00
01:06:30 Fox Effect: influences other cable nets 00:03:10
01:09:40 A call to action: get involved 00:03:50
01:13:30 credits


2 comments

I agree, I didn't have anything for or against FOX News until I saw the movie. Then I got mad. This is really bad for our democracy. I can't believe more people watch FOX than watch CNN.

So I got together with some friends and we decided to DO somthing about it. http://www.foxblocker.com

By Blogger Joshua Montgomery, at 8/09/2004 2:25 PM  

I can't stand fox, but I thought the graph used to show the difference between FOX viewers to those who get their news from PBS/NPR was ridiculous. A better representation would have been to show the difference between FOX viewers, MSNBC viewers, CNN viewers, and PBS/NPR. For all we know there might be just as many idiots who watch MSNBC and CNN. I think the results would have looked dramatically different.
I hate FOX and I hate Bush, but if you are going to try to prove your point - do it so that few can question it. Everytime critics can find holes, they'll disregard the entire film as Liberal propoganda. If the documentary chose to be "Fair and Balanced" - it would have been much more powerful.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/25/2004 9:06 AM  

Post a Comment