uggabugga





Saturday, July 30, 2005

Judith Miller revisited: (Our 26 June 2003 post, to give you an idea of how tight Miller is with the neocon crowd and why she may be deeply involved with the trashing of Joe Wilson.)

Org chart:

The Washington Post has a detailed story about New York Times reporter Judith Miller and her influence over U.S. military officials and operations.  She is also closely connected to Ahmed Chalabi of the INC.  In the wake of this news, Eric Alterman writes, "... if this story is true, it is really beyond belief."  We agree.  Miller has become part of the team(s), and should not be considered an impartial reporter. We diagram key points from the Post story below:






UPDATE: Miller has connections with Daniel Pipes' Middle East Forum (story)
UPDATE: Arianna Huffington recaps this situation in a post of 28 July 2005.

(Miller/Wilson error corrected.)


17 comments

I think in your openning line you meant Joe Wilson.

The word "trashing", although, often used is also incorrect.
To reveal that his wife was a CIA agent didn't not harm his reputation. It destroyed her position. It was intimidation not slander.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/30/2005 7:16 AM  

Actually, it was both:
Disclosing her status would intimidate others who might have such vulnerabilities to protect;
The "trashing" was to insinuate that she "got" him the job (dependency on the wife).

The later has actually been part of the recent spinning by the RNC hacks.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/30/2005 12:46 PM  

though her fait may be sealed that she is not really a journalist, rather a pundit to further the Bush crooks... I don't think it will hurt Ms. Miller in anyway. To think of her payoff when she gets out of her 180 jail sentence... not too terrible of a "stay," in my opinion for the historically documented rewards that have been received by other crooks connected to this admin... she's set.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/30/2005 1:12 PM  

But Judy needed to be a defacto general because Rummy fired all the best ones.

By Blogger granny, at 7/31/2005 1:47 AM  

My cristel ball also says that Fitzerald will be 'out of their'.
Maybe they will get Kissassinjar, to take care of this for them, arfter all he was a bit to obvious for the 911 commity, but he's still a 'good man'.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/31/2005 3:49 AM  

And we note with more than a bit of bitterness that all--every single one--of Miller's front-page exclusives was wrong in both the broad strokes and the details.

There was a time in journalism that getting a major above-the-fold front page article that badly wrong would have exiled the reporter to writing obituaries or doing the police blotter (if not outright fired). Getting three articles wrong would definitely have resulted in a "Perhaps you should consider some other line of work" meeting.

Alas, today, being so consistently wrong about matters of national and international import gets you promoted and protected. The world is upside down!

Derelict

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/31/2005 6:23 AM  

Miller also co-authored a book with Weekly Standard Wingnut Laurie Mylroie & was part of the stable of neo-con speakers at Benador Associates.

By Blogger Steve J., at 7/31/2005 9:16 AM  

It all looks pretty clear to me; Judith Miller works for the CIA. She's a plant at the New York Times. It's old news that the CIA has plants in newspapers to spread propaganda. The question this begs is, who, above Miller at the New York Times, is directing traffic for the CIA?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7/31/2005 11:57 PM  

check out the grossly preferential treatment judy got as a "reporter". via wolcott.

(the dalliance rumor though i could have done without.)

indictments or no, everbody should keep the pressure up in calling for congressional hearings. of course republicans will never oblige. but their very refusal will paint them to look corrupt. everybody knows and nobody can deny that republicans would have held hearings had this been a clinton scandal. congress' favorable ratings are low, republicans stonewalling investigating legitimate concerns can only drive it even lower.

nov '06, here we come.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/01/2005 10:19 AM  

There was a time in journalism that getting a major above-the-fold front page article that badly wrong would have exiled the reporter to writing obituaries or doing the police blotter (if not outright fired).

good point. you think having a carlyle group member on the nyt's board of directers have something to do with it?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/01/2005 10:41 AM  

to give you an idea of how tight Miller is with the neocon crowd...

judith miller's membership to JINSA would also suggest that.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/01/2005 10:45 AM  

Please see http://www.franklingate.com
just getting started
comments, suggestions welcome
Keenly tracking Judith Miller as glue to Plamegate and 'Franklingate'

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/05/2005 6:38 PM  

Hi, Thank you for having this info on the web. I enjoyed your post. If you may have any interest in
debt
then I know where you may get your solution. For your comfort, I have enclosed the link, so if needed you can visit the site. Thanks again for your lovely blog. credit

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4/12/2006 8:47 PM  

Bay Area Funeral Service - San Jose Funeral Home San Jose Funeral Home serving the whole Bay Area for all of your funeral needs: Memorial Services, Cremation servies, Graveside Services and all your ...
www.bayareafuneralservice.com

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1/24/2010 9:29 PM  

Such an interesting article here.I was searching for something like that for quite a long time and at last I have found it here.
Joker Yellow Vest

By Blogger Jobi, at 12/26/2020 12:01 AM  

provides the quality service of customized fiber connections in the case of large businesses and government entities. Team Canada Olympic Jacket

By Blogger eddielydon, at 10/29/2021 11:22 PM  

Thank you very much for this great post. Commissar Coat

By Blogger George Mark, at 12/19/2021 10:56 PM  

Post a Comment